| 08/18/2006 09:18:01 AM
New research which suggests that dolphins are not
intelligent has been dismissed by marine mammal experts as
flawed.
According to Paul Manger, of the University of the Witwatersand
in Johannesburg, the structure of the dolphin’s brain is not built for complex
information processing, “but to counter the thermal challenges of being a mammal
in water”, in other words it is an adaptation to life in cold water.
Mark Simmonds, WDCS Director of Science, comments: ‘Manger is
putting forward what he and everyone else who is interested in intelligence
knows to be a new theory that contradicts what other experts are saying. There
is no doubt that dolphins have unusual brain structure relative to terrestrial
mammals and this reflects millennia of separate evolution. However, you cannot
measure intelligence from brain size or anatomy. Whilst these aspects of anatomy
give clues, such an approach is rather old-fashioned. Intelligence
is investigated by behavioural studies and there are now many careful scientific
studies that have been published that help establish the case that these animals
should be regarded as intelligent. The same kinds of tests that have helped to
establish intelligence in the great apes have been applied successfully to
dolphins. I have recently reviewed the relevant scientific literature (and have
a scientific paper in press on cetacean intelligence) and I believe Manger to be
incorrect in his interpretation of the available behavioural data.'
The
process of science is one in which theories are published, reviewed and
challenged by others and there is no doubt that this work will precipitate a
strong response. Professor Lori Marino of Emory University in the US, an expert
on dolphin behaviour and brain anatomy, said 'Manger flagrantly brushes aside
decades of work by a whole generation of well-respected and
internationally-known marine mammal scientists whose findings provide no support
for his arguments. Moreover, Manger’s findings are based on a number of
incorrect data values and flawed data analytic techniques. In a paper we
are preparing my colleagues and I will show that Manger’s findings on
thermoregulation and brain size are an artifact of body size. Finally, Manger’s
arguments rely upon outdated and stunningly obsolete views of dolphin brain
structure. In sum, it is very unfortunate that such a methodologically and
theoretically flawed paper as Manger’s has received any attention at
all.'
There is considerable evidence from many scientists pointing to the
fact that dolphins are highly intelligent mammals. Simmonds added "Some media
reports have featured Manger’s work without appreciating that it is just one
theory, against a whole body of work that points in the opposite direction."
Source: WDCS
|